Оглавление
- PART ONE. MY EARLY ASSOCIATIONS WITH GINGER STOTT
- CHAPTER I. THE MOTIVE
- I
- II
- III
- IV
- CHAPTER II. NOTES FOR A BIOGRAPHY OF GINGER STOTT
- I
- II
- III
- IV
- V
- VI
- VII
- VIII
- CHAPTER III. THE DISILLUSIONMENT OF GINGER STOTT
- I
- II
- III
- PART TWO. THE CHILDHOOD OF THE WONDER
- CHAPTER IV. THE MANNER OF HIS BIRTH
- I
- II
- III
- IV
- CHAPTER V. HIS DEPARTURE FROM STOKE-UNDERHILL
- I
- II
- III
- IV
- V
- CHAPTER VI. HIS FATHER'S DESERTION
- I
- II
- III
- CHAPTER VII. HIS DEBT TO HENRY CHALLIS
- I
- II
- III
- IV
- V
- CHAPTER VIII. HIS FIRST VISIT TO CHALLIS COURT
- I
- II
- INTERLUDE
- PART TWO (Continued). THE WONDER AMONG BOOKS
- CHAPTER IX. HIS PASSAGE THROUGH THE PRISON OF KNOWLEDGE
- I
- II
- III
- IV
- V
- VI
- VII
- CHAPTER X. HIS PASTORS AND MASTERS
- I
- II
- CHAPTER XI. HIS EXAMINATION
- I
- II
- III
- IV
- V
- VI
- CHAPTER XII. HIS INTERVIEW WITH HERR GROSSMANN
- I
- II
- III
- IV
- CHAPTER XIII. FUGITIVE
- PART THREE. MY ASSOCIATION WITH THE WONDER
- CHAPTER XIV. HOW I WENT TO PYM TO WRITE A BOOK
- I
- II
- III
- IV
- V
- VI
- CHAPTER XV. THE INCIPIENCE OF MY SUBJECTION TO THE WONDER
- I
- II
- III
- IV
- V
- VI
- VII
- CHAPTER XVI. THE PROGRESS AND RELAXATION OF MY SUBJECTION
- I
- II
- III
- IV
- V
- VI
- CHAPTER XVII. RELEASE
- I
- II
- III
- IV
- V
- VI
- VII
- VIII
- IX
- CHAPTER XVIII. IMPLICATIONS
- I
- II
- III
- IV
- V
- CHAPTER XIX. EPILOGUE
- THE USES OF MYSTERY
- Главная
- Джон Дэвис Бересфорд
- 📚 Книги
- The Wonder
- Читать онлайн
- CHAPTER II. NOTES FOR A BIOGRAPHY OF GINGER STOTTCHAPTER II. NOTES FOR A BIOGRAPHY OF GINGER STOTT
CHAPTER II. NOTES FOR A BIOGRAPHY OF GINGER STOTT
I
Ginger Stott is a name that was once as well known as any in England. Stott has been the subject of leading articles in every daily paper; his life has been written by an able journalist who interviewed Stott himself, during ten crowded minutes, and filled three hundred pages with details, seventy per cent. of which were taken from the journals, and the remainder supplied by a brilliant imagination. Ten years ago Ginger Stott was on a pinnacle, there was a Stott vogue. You found his name at the bottom of signed articles written by members of the editorial staff; you bought Stott collars, although Stott himself did not wear collars; there was a Stott waltz, which is occasionally hummed by clerks, and whistled by errand-boys to this day; there was a periodical which lived for ten months, entitled Ginger Stott's Weekly; in brief, during one summer there was a Stott apotheosis.
But that was ten years ago, and the rising generation has almost forgotten the once well-known name. One rarely sees him mentioned in the morning paper now, and then it is but the briefest reference; some such note as this "Pickering was at the top of his form, recalling the finest achievements of Ginger Stott at his best," or "Flack is a magnificent find for Kent: he promises to completely surpass the historic feats of Ginger Stott." These journalistic superlatives only irritate those who remember the performances referred to. We who watched the man's career know that Pickering and Flack are but tyros compared to Stott; we know that none of his successors has challenged comparison with him. He was a meteor that blazed across the sky, and if he ever has a true successor, such stars as Pickering and Flack will shine pale and dim in comparison.
It makes one feel suddenly old to recall that great matinée at the Lyceum, given for Ginger Stott's benefit after he met with his accident. In ten years so many great figures in that world have died or fallen into obscurity. I can count on my fingers the number of those who were then, and are still, in the forefront of popularity. Of the others poor Captain Wallis, for instance, is dead—and no modern writer, in my opinion, can equal the brilliant descriptiveness of Wallis's articles in the Daily Post. Bobby Maisefield, again, Stott's colleague, is a martyr to rheumatism, and keeps a shop in Ailesworth, the scene of so many of his triumphs. What a list one might make, but how uselessly. It is enough to note how many names have dropped out, how many others are the names of those we now speak of as veterans. In ten years! It certainly makes one feel old.