
Ваша оценкаЦитаты
Аноним22 января 2017 г.Склонность разума всё упрощать приводит к ошибочным суждениям. Это называется «преувеличенная эмоциональная когерентность», известная как эффект ореола.
5267
Аноним4 июля 2016 г.Читать далееЕсли вам важно казаться умным и достойным доверия, не используйте сложные слова в случаях, где достаточно простых. Дэнни Оппенхаймер, мой коллега из Принстона, развеял бытующий среди студентов миф о том, что обширный словарный запас нравится преподавателям. В статье "Последствия употребления научного жаргона без учёта необходимости: проблемы при необоснованном использовании длинных слов" он показал, что облечение знакомых мыслей в претенциозные слова считается признаком низкого интеллекта и малой достоверности информации.
5249
Аноним4 июля 2016 г.Единственной знакомой фразы в утверждении достаточно для того, чтобы всё утверждение казалось знакомым, а значит, истинным.
5218
Аноним25 апреля 2016 г.A general limitation of the human mind is its imperfect ability to reconstruct past states of knowledge, or beliefs that have changed. Once you adopt a new view of the world (or of any part of it), you immediately lose much of your ability to recall what you used to believe before your mind changed.
51,7K
Аноним5 марта 2016 г.Читать далееThe lesson is clear: estimates of causes of death are warped by media coverage. The coverage is itself biased toward novelty and poignancy. The media do not just shape what the public is interested in, but also are shaped by it. Editors cannot ignore the public’s demands that certain topics and viewpoints receive extensive coverage. Unusual events (such as botulism) attract disproportionate attention and are consequently perceived as less unusual than they really are. The world in our heads is not a precise replica of reality; our expectations about the frequency of events are distorted by the prevalence and emotional intensity of the messages to which we are exposed.
The estimates of causes of death are an almost direct representation of the activation of ideas in associative memory, and are a good example of substitution.52,3K
Аноним5 марта 2016 г.Читать далееThe widespread misunderstanding of randomness sometimes has significant consequences. In our article on representativeness, Amos and I cited the statistician William Feller, who illustrated the ease with which people see patterns where none exists. During the intensive rocket bombing of London in World War II, it was generally believed that the bombing could not be random because a map of the hits revealed conspicuous gaps. Some suspected that German spies were located in the unharmed areas. A careful statistical analysis revealed that the distribution of hits was typical of a random process—and typical as well in evoking a strong impression that it was not random. “To the untrained eye,” Feller remarks, “randomness appears as regularity or tendency to cluster.”
51,4K
Аноним4 марта 2016 г.Evaluating people as attractive or not is a basic assessment. You do that automatically whether or not you want to, and it influences you.
52,2K
Аноним23 января 2016 г.Читать далееA Bias to Believe and Confirm
The psychologist Daniel Gilbert, widely known as the author of Stumbling to Happiness, once wrote an essay, titled “How Mental Systems Believe,” in which he developed a theory of believing and unbelieving that he traced to the seventeenth-century philosopher Baruch Spinoza. Gilbert proposed that understanding a statement must begin with an attempt to believe it: you must first know what the idea would mean if it were true. Only then can you decide whether or not to unbelieve it.51,3K
Аноним23 января 2016 г.Читать далееThese findings add to the growing evidence that good mood, intuition, creativity, gullibility, and increased reliance on System 1 form a cluster. At the other pole, sadness, vigilance, suspicion, an analytic approach, and increased effort also go together. A happy mood loosens the control of System 2 over performance: when in a good mood, people become more intuitive and more creative but also less vigilant and more prone to logical errors. Here again, as in the mere exposure effect, the connection makes biological sense. A good mood is a signal that things are generally going well, the environment is safe, and it is all right to let one’s guard down. A bad mood indicates that things are not going very well, there may be a threat, and vigilance is required. Cognitive ease is both a cause and a consequence of a pleasant feeling.
51,9K
Аноним23 января 2016 г.Читать далееThe lesson of figure 5 is that predictable illusions inevitably occur if a judgment is based on an impression of cognitive ease or strain. Anything that makes it easier for the associative machine to run smoothly will also bias beliefs. A reliable way to make people believe in falsehoods is frequent repetition, because familiarity is not easily distinguished from truth. Authoritarian institutions and marketers have always known this fact. But it was psychologists who discovered that you do not have to repeat the entire statement of a fact or idea to make it appear true.
51,1K